The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was Redirect as mentioned below as it seems no further comments are needed for this currently clear consensus (NAC).
SwisterTwistertalk 06:34, 17 December 2015 (UTC)reply
Article is mainly promotional. Relevant encyclopedic details about silent auctions are already covered at
Auction#Secondary. Suggested outcome is a redirect to
Auction, preferably specifically to the silent auction bullet. RJaguar3 |
u |
t 01:44, 16 December 2015 (UTC)reply
Redirect to
Auction#Secondary (I don't think there's a way to have it go directly to the bullet point).
Silent auction (singular), which would be the proper title, already redirects to
Auction. Nominator's assessment of the state of the article is spot-on; there doesn't seem to be any salvageable info (and it's pretty much unsourced, to boot). If the concept itself is deemed notable, someone can start an article at the proper title.
ansh666 02:24, 16 December 2015 (UTC)reply
Redirect All the reasons mentioned are spot on. Dismas|
(talk) 02:32, 16 December 2015 (UTC)reply
Redirect If this could be done speedily, that would be awesome.
JDDJS (
talk) 05:41, 16 December 2015 (UTC)reply
Redirect it's a real thing, it should probably have its own article, this sure as hell isn't it.
Artw (
talk) 06:24, 16 December 2015 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.