The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. T. Canens ( talk) 03:39, 22 May 2019 (UTC) reply

Shuchir Suri

Shuchir Suri (  | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)

(Find sources:  Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Does not appear to meet WP:GNG. Presented sources are either interview or do not cover the subject in-depth. Hitro talk 10:05, 30 April 2019 (UTC) reply

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Food and drink-related deletion discussions. CASSIOPEIA^{( talk)} 10:06, 30 April 2019 (UTC) reply

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. CASSIOPEIA^{( talk)} 10:06, 30 April 2019 (UTC) reply

It seems that the Article is based on Good Sources with the same information shown in the article Shuchir Suri. Radadiyageet ( talk) 07:53, 1 May 2019 (UTC) reply

• Delete - seems entirely promotional - doesn't meet WP:ANYBIO - Epinoia ( talk) 02:30, 6 May 2019 (UTC) reply

• Don't delete* Criticism and sources added. Now the Article Shuchir Suri seems complete with sources and facts. ShaymAnu ( talk) 06:12, 6 May 2019 (UTC) reply

• Don't delete as the Article is improved now. Promotional Words deleted and Criticism added by contributors. Radadiyageet ( talk) 06:36, 6 May 2019 (UTC) reply

• Comment Something seems fishy here. Radadiyageet was the one who created the article in the first place. In addition, ShaymAnu had very few edits, but mostly editing that article. CobaltBlue101 ( talk) 18:10, 7 May 2019 (UTC) reply

- additional Comment - I agree, there seems to be an element of promotion here, WP:SPIP, WP:NOTPROMOTION - Epinoia ( talk) 18:15, 7 May 2019 (UTC) reply

• Delete Fails WP:NBIO. Non-notable individual. -- Rsrikanth05 ( talk) 19:45, 7 May 2019 (UTC) reply

  Also, @ ShaymAnu and Radadiyageet: if you don't want to confuse the closing admin, please say Keep and not Don't delete. -- Rsrikanth05 ( talk) 19:46, 7 May 2019 (UTC) reply

• Keep - CobaltBlue101, Epinoia and Rsrikanth05, I agree that I am editing this article mostly, But i suggest to check the quality of an Article also. The Article is neutral and completely based on the reliable sources now which are fair enough as per Wikipedia Policy. There is no promotional word in Article and also a Criticism Section added now so If you still find it as promotional Article, You can improve the Article instead of deleting it because we all are here for Contribution. Thank You. Radadiyageet ( talk) 07:26, 8 May 2019 (UTC) reply

- see WP:PLEASEDONT - looking more and more like promotion and advertising - WP:NOTADVERTISING - and I couldn't locate the guideline, but I believe that each editor gets one !vote, not multiple !votes - Epinoia ( talk) 20:20, 8 May 2019 (UTC) reply

• Delete After looking at the sources and the article itself, I agree with Hitro. CobaltBlue101 ( talk) 17:59, 8 May 2019 (UTC) reply

• Keep - I also agree with Hitro but I would say there are also many other sources cited in Article which we can not ignore. I also agree with Radadiyageet that the Article should be improved instead of deleting it if needed. ShaymAnu ( talk) 09:10, 11 May 2019 (UTC) reply

• Delete per WP:TOO SOON. शिव साहिल/Shiv Sahil ( talk) 16:17, 15 May 2019 (UTC) reply
• Keep Seems notable for sure, with enough sources to prove that. Exploreandwrite ( talk) 08:37, 21 May 2019 (UTC) reply
• Delete per WP:NOTPROMOTION - GretLomborg ( talk) 21:51, 21 May 2019 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.