The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Keep arguments were neither refuted nor discussed further. So Why 07:38, 15 July 2017 (UTC) reply

Shroud (player)

Shroud (player) (  | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)

(Find sources:  Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:NBIO. He is not an athlete, and being a Counter-Strike: Global Offensive player is not sufficient for notability. GeoffreyT2000 ( talk) 16:21, 22 June 2017 (UTC) reply

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Video games-related deletion discussions. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 22:42, 22 June 2017 (UTC) reply

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Canada-related deletion discussions. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 22:42, 22 June 2017 (UTC) reply

• Keep. Being a CS:GO player is not automatic notability, but Shroud is a star player on a top NA team, [1] and has generated lots of coverage. Examples of the more in-depth examples detail his revelation of problems with sound cues from the audience, [2] [3], his expected retirement, [4] [5] [6], among others. [7] [8] ---- Patar knight - ^chat/ _{contributions} 19:30, 28 June 2017 (UTC) reply

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal ( talk) 04:32, 7 July 2017 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.