The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
Non-notable person (fails
WP:GNG,
WP:BIO), founder of two non-notable organizations with no non-trivial coverage found via Google, and the article has a promotional bent. It isn't clear that any of the fellowships or awards mentioned are notable either—they may be routine study programs for students (which he may certainly be proud of, but they don't confer notability).
Largoplazo (
talk) 00:48, 19 January 2021 (UTC)reply
Delete per nom. Doesn't meet requirements for
WP:NACADEMIC either.
Ajf773 (
talk) 01:05, 19 January 2021 (UTC)reply
Delete Possibly even Speedy Delete under
WP:A7. Best,
GPL93 (
talk) 01:35, 19 January 2021 (UTC)reply
Delete - none of the sources provide substantial coverage - they're mostly just lists that include his name. That doesn't approach notability under the GNG, and I see nothing that would satisfy any relevant SNG.
Extraordinary Writ (
talk) 04:55, 19 January 2021 (UTC)reply
Delete - none of the awards confer notability and nothing on Google Scholar shows that he is notable; zero coverage found in a search
Spiderone 11:52, 19 January 2021 (UTC)reply
Speedy Delete per nom. Mostly likle UPE/CoI spam.
RationalPuff (
talk) 12:48, 19 January 2021 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.