The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete.
King of♥♦♣ ♠ 04:26, 11 January 2017 (UTC)reply
In contrast to what the title suggests, this is about the Shekhawati region instead of the Shekhawati people and we already have a good article about the
Shekhawati region so this is redundant.
Marcocapelle (
talk) 20:46, 20 December 2016 (UTC)reply
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, st170etalk 00:21, 28 December 2016 (UTC)reply
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
B E C K Y S A Y L E S 14:30, 4 January 2017 (UTC)reply
Delete this is a description of a region and there is no indication given of a culturally distinctive group. Quetzal1964 15:26, 4 January 2017 (UTC)
Delete - no evidence that this is an actual ethnic group
Spiderone 18:55, 4 January 2017 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.