The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
Nothing better than mere-mentions in independent sources. Does not meet
WP:GNG. Awards won do not meet
WP:ANYBIO. signed, Rosguilltalk 06:10, 25 June 2020 (UTC)reply
Delete Agree does not meet
WP:GNG. Modest military career. Modest post-military accomplishments.
David notMD (
talk) 14:11, 25 June 2020 (UTC)reply
Delete Agree -- subject is not notable.
Delete Nothing that he's done is sufficiently distinguished, fails
WP:NSOLDIER as well as
WP:NBIO, a search reveals no coverage that would establish notability
Eddie891TalkWork 17:52, 25 June 2020 (UTC)reply
Delete. The sources cited provide no evidence of notability.
Maproom (
talk) 22:20, 25 June 2020 (UTC)reply
Redirect to
2020 Singaporean general election now that he's a candidate in the election. He won't be notable until (if) he wins. We don't postpone AFDs, but the redirect will easily allow the article to be recreated should he win.
Eddie891TalkWork 14:21, 26 June 2020 (UTC)reply
Redirect as suggested. The redirect can be reverted if and when he wins the election.
– robertsky (
talk) 05:15, 27 June 2020 (UTC)reply
In that case, redirect is the way to go. signed, Rosguilltalk 05:33, 27 June 2020 (UTC)reply
Delete: Mostly edited by himself or his friends. Clearly self-promotion.
BlueD954 (
talk) 14:23, 28 June 2020 (UTC)reply
Delete: The article, which by the way, he wrote it himself, does not sound like bibliography using
peacock terms and violates
WP:NPOV guidelines. Pls expedite the deletion before this goes too far.
SecretSquirrel78 (
talk) 15:03, 28 June 2020 (UTC)reply
Speedy Delete On second thoughts, editors can request
WP:REFUND if and when he wins the elections. Speedy, as such articles should not have been created in the first place as it is jumping the gun.
– robertsky (
talk) 03:05, 29 June 2020 (UTC)reply
Robertsky, the decision for redirect vs delete is based on the longstanding convention that it's appropriate to redirect a non-notable candidate to an election page. The fact that the article should not have been created has nothing to do with it, both outcomes agree that it should not have been created. signed, Rosguilltalk 03:29, 29 June 2020 (UTC)reply
@
Rosguill: okie. redirect then. apologies about the flip-flop.
– robertsky (
talk) 06:57, 29 June 2020 (UTC)reply
Redirect per longstanding practice to redirect candidate's names to the article about the corresponding election. If he wins, the article can be recreated immediately.
Cullen328Let's discuss it 04:00, 29 June 2020 (UTC)reply
Redirect as per redirect reasons above
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.