The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
Delete — All the sources are self-published, blog, or Amazon, except for the professional award; and being one of 37 awards handed out annually, in a relatively obscure (or at least unique & narrowly focused) field, hardly seems to, in and of itself, demonstrate notability. — Who R you?Talk 05:03, 11 June 2014 (UTC)reply
Do not delete - A greater array of more dependable sources has since been added, including educational journals and the Chicago Tribune. 19:04, 11 June 2014
User:Jourdan SayersUser talk:Jourdan Sayers
Keep. Initial and subsequent versions of article did not show sufficient sources, because article did not conform to Wikipedia's standards, but the revamped version has enough references, including
reliable publications talking about her work in depth. In addition, she won an ASLA award. Notable person, meets
WP:GNG.--
Tomwsulcer (
talk) 03:20, 17 June 2014 (UTC)reply
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Dennis Brown |
2¢ |
WER 13:48, 19 June 2014 (UTC)reply
Borderline Keep per sources provided, If I'm honest the cite titles should be trimmed down as it takes up a huge amount of the article, Also I've gone with "Borderline Keep" because I myself don't believe she's entirely notable as such but yeah sources have been provided so all's good. –
Davey2010 •
(talk) 15:17, 19 June 2014 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.