The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete.
Kurykh (
talk) 21:39, 25 February 2017 (UTC)reply
Still nothing for actual independent notability and the listed sources are merely announcements, events, mentions and all similar, none of it substantiates or bestow him the needed notability; searches in fact mirrors this and the history shows there were no attempts to show this could in fact be improved.
SwisterTwistertalk 22:29, 10 February 2017 (UTC)reply
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 02:38, 17 February 2017 (UTC)reply
Delete a journalist without the level of coverage of him, as opposed to works by him, to show he is notable.
John Pack Lambert (
talk) 20:07, 20 February 2017 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.