- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. ✗ plicit 05:06, 22 January 2022 (UTC)
Shari Foos
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- Shari Foos ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log | edits since nomination)
- (Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Searches did not turn up enough in-depth coverage from independent reliable sources to show they meet WP:GNG. And they do not appear to meet any of the SNG's either. Onel5969 TT me 19:06, 9 January 2022 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions. Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 19:11, 9 January 2022 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 19:11, 9 January 2022 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Ineligible for soft deletion: previously dePRODded.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Extraordinary Writ ( talk) 22:44, 16 January 2022 (UTC)
- Delete the article contains lots of unreliable sources and the subject doesn't meet WP:GNG. Sincerely, Գարիկ Ավագյան ( talk) 12:41, 19 January 2022 (UTC)
- Delete per nom. Chumpih t 17:54, 19 January 2022 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.