The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, TheSpecialUserTSU 06:05, 28 August 2012 (UTC)reply
Delete - reading like an advert isn't really a reason to delete as the article can always be rewritten. The subject, however, does not appear sufficiently notable to satisfy
WP:GNG. Only two references are provided, one of which is the official site and the other makes no mention of the subject at all. I can't find any additional sources.
§everal⇒|
Times 17:32, 28 August 2012 (UTC)reply
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Mark Arsten (
talk) 16:02, 4 September 2012 (UTC)reply
Delete It is an interesting project model, but lacking in sufficient
reliable 3rd party sources discussing ShareKitchen itself. It is worth noting the comments by the original contributor on the
Talk:ShareKitchen page; however even if all the sources mentioned were verifiably in the article, they would fall below
WP:CORPDEPTH, at least for the time being.
AllyD (
talk) 21:44, 4 September 2012 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.