The result was delete. ✗ plicit 00:02, 12 June 2023 (UTC)
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
Someone claiming to be the subject of the article has asked at the Teahouse that it be deleted. Of course the subject's wishes are not the main consideration; if the subject is notable, the article should not be deleted. But fundamentally this is a piece of gossip, sourced to gossip. In summary: Prostitute conned a client out of an eyewatering amount of cash, got jailed and had a very small controversy over whether they should be paid for making a public health advert. It's not hard to find newspaper articles and interviews; the subject is clearly the sort of person who aims to get interviewed and seen driving a big car [1]. But these look to me like gossip-column stuff befitting the Daily Mail. Unsurprisingly, when I search for her British victim's name, the only UK news source seems to be the Daily Mail. I cannot assess the reliability of the Ugandan press, but it seems to me possible that the subject is, in fact, a minor figure famous for one event only, this article serving only to enhance her fame/notoriety (whichever way you look at it). Definitely worth a second opinion on whether this is the sort of stuff we want in WP. Elemimele ( talk) 20:44, 31 May 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
✗
plicit 23:43, 7 June 2023 (UTC)