- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was keep. Seems that the nominator also agrees to keep, as noted in the discussion. (non-admin closure) Natg 19 ( talk) 02:07, 30 April 2020 (UTC)
Shadi Hamid
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- Shadi Hamid ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Nominatec based on notability guidelines DrSangChi ( talk) 19:57, 23 April 2020 (UTC)
- Automated comment: This AfD was not correctly transcluded to the log ( step 3). I have transcluded it to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2020 April 23. — cyberbot I Talk to my owner:Online 20:10, 23 April 2020 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions. Shellwood ( talk) 20:11, 23 April 2020 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 20:18, 23 April 2020 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Washington, D.C.-related deletion discussions. North America 1000 20:45, 23 April 2020 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of England-related deletion discussions. North America 1000 20:45, 23 April 2020 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of California-related deletion discussions. North America 1000 20:45, 23 April 2020 (UTC)
- Keep. Two books and an edited volume, all of which have been reviewed significantly, looks like an unambiguous pass of WP:NAUTHOR. I added reviews to the article and added another reference or two. There are some WP:PROMO issues, and the article is still a little under-referenced. Russ Woodroofe ( talk) 12:57, 24 April 2020 (UTC)
- Keep with the changes made by Russ. Thank you for your help. Still think article has some other issues. User:DrSangChi ( talk) 3:25, 24 April 2020 (UTC)
- Keep. The reviews are enough for WP:AUTHOR. — David Eppstein ( talk) 05:32, 27 April 2020 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.