The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete.
Barkeep49 (
talk) 01:03, 12 October 2020 (UTC)reply
Delete — Per solid rationale provided by
Stormy Chamber. Furthermore, an individual is notable based on their own merit & not by proximity to a notable entity. Celestina007 (
talk) 20:38, 1 October 2020 (UTC)reply
Delete: per nom. Article does not meet GNG, BASIC, ANYBIO or NACTOR. Notability and sourcing guidelines should be strictly followed for BLPs. //
Timothy :: talk 02:40, 10 October 2020 (UTC)reply
Delete The subject does not meet
WP:GNG or
WP:BASIC. Although there is a good deal of coverage on him, none of it seems to be in reliable sources.
Modussiccandi (
talk) 22:57, 11 October 2020 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.