The result was delete. – Juliancolton | Talk 00:08, 21 April 2009 (UTC) reply
I only found this article through Talk:James Buchanan; it is not linked to from any articles and rightly so. A POV fork whose content, by definition, can only be speculation unless there's some groundbreaking new information that comes out. I was going to just replace it with a redirect given the orphan status but decided to nominate it here instead. In addition to the POV fork objection, I can't think of a reason why it would justify an article. If it becomes a big enough issue, a section can be created at James Buchanan (the poor man is only known as the one who fudged things up prior to Lincoln - being known as the first gay president would be an improvement). Recognizance ( talk) 02:32, 14 April 2009 (UTC) reply