The result was keep. MBisanz talk 01:11, 24 April 2009 (UTC) reply
No evidence of particular notability is given here. Seems like just more piling on, and Wikipedia is NOTNEWS. SarekOfVulcan ( talk) 19:20, 10 April 2009 (UTC) reply
Grounds for deletion cited are notability and NOTNEWS. However, notability is satisfied because there has been nontrivial coverage in multiple reliable sources, and notnews is satisfied because (to quote notnews), "news coverage goes beyond a single event". (The events in question include the Sunday Tribune's initial breakage of the story, Sean Sherlock's intervention, the apologies, the Pope's intervention, and the Commission of Inquiry, which all receive separate coverage.)
Therefore, no valid reason for deletion survives a serious examination of the subject.— S Marshall Talk/ Cont 21:43, 17 April 2009 (UTC) reply
I suppose it's a tenable point of view that this is "one event" that spans several months, but I should think that stretches the meaning of "one event" rather too far.— S Marshall Talk/ Cont 22:30, 17 April 2009 (UTC) reply