- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was keep. ( non-admin closure) feminist ( talk) 04:33, 25 January 2017 (UTC)
Seth Stewart
- Seth Stewart ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Not notable yet. Only 3 Broadway credits, one was ensemble, one was a very minor role and the other is a replacement role. That's just not enough to be notable. JDDJS ( talk) 23:55, 17 January 2017 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. Lepricavark ( talk) 01:22, 18 January 2017 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. Lepricavark ( talk) 01:22, 18 January 2017 (UTC)
- Strong Keep. Subject easily passes WP:NACTOR: with multiple roles in 3 Broadway shows - two of those Broadway shows in major roles; and WP:ANYBIO and WP:BASIC with significant media coverage, including recent coverage here, here and here, and a social media presence of thousands of followers, significant enough to be verified on two separate platforms, here and here. Frankly, I see no basis for this nomination. Article clearly needs expansion and additional sources, which are readily available. But just as clearly, subject is notable. X4n6 ( talk) 11:07, 20 January 2017 (UTC)
- He has one major role. Graffiti Pete is not a major role. JDDJS ( talk) 23:00, 23 January 2017 (UTC)
- Comment. Have you read the links I provided, JDDJS? Are you not aware of whom this article is about? His current Broadway roles are as the Marquis de Lafayette & Thomas Jefferson in Hamilton. And Graffiti Pete is indeed a major role. So much so, it was newsworthy when Stewart left the role. Also, Stewart was called "a particular standout" in that role in the original New York Times review. So your claims that the role wasn't major and he's only had one major role, are clearly wrong. Again, the article needs expansion, but that is no basis for nomination. Subject's press coverage proves he's notable. But I'll list the article as a stub, which will resolve this. X4n6 ( talk) 06:37, 24 January 2017 (UTC)
- Keep - article needs improvements, but its not a reason for deletion. Subject has received rather significant press coverage. I also doubt we can say that he has only 3 Broadway credits, especially when his contribution is not small. Tymon.r Do you have any questions? 21:18, 23 January 2017 (UTC)
- Do you know what discussion you are commenting in? Seth Stewart is a male. JDDJS ( talk) 23:00, 23 January 2017 (UTC)
- @ JDDJS: I do. Thanks for pointing it out. An oversight, it happens. Tymon.r Do you have any questions? 23:41, 23 January 2017 (UTC)
- Keep I can understand why this article was nominated. It's a good faith nomination where the nominator may have missed the sources. I missed them too in my initial search and wouldn't have looked further but for the comments of the !voters above. My review of the sources confirms the subject passes NACTOR. I'm hopeful someone will expand this article. It has good GA potential and can be expanded. Lourdes 03:10, 25 January 2017 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.