The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was soft delete. WP:REFUND applies. Ritchie333 ^{(talk) (cont)} 13:19, 14 August 2017 (UTC) reply

Selma Prodanović

Selma Prodanović (  | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)

(Find sources:  Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Advertorially slanted WP:BLP of an entrepreneur, which cites no reliable source coverage about her at all -- the only "referencing" here is a primary source linkfarm of external links for her own companies and professional affiliations. As always, Wikipedia is not a free LinkedIn alternative on which people get to post versions of their own résumés -- it's an encyclopedia, on which inclusion depends on being the subject of reliable source coverage in media. And while there is a more neutral version in the history before it got advertorialized, it was referenced exclusively to primary sources and WordPress blogs and so simply reverting the advertorialism isn't the key to a keep here. No prejudice against recreation in the future if somebody can write and source it properly, but this as written isn't acceptable. Bearcat ( talk) 15:22, 30 July 2017 (UTC) reply

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. North America ¹⁰⁰⁰ 17:17, 30 July 2017 (UTC) reply

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Austria-related deletion discussions. North America ¹⁰⁰⁰ 17:17, 30 July 2017 (UTC) reply

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple ( talk) 14:55, 31 July 2017 (UTC) reply

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bosnia and Herzegovina-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple ( talk) 14:55, 31 July 2017 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.