The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was no consensus. No valid deletion rationale, but also not much of a case for "keep" here. Sandstein 19:32, 12 February 2020 (UTC)reply
keep nominator's rationale is not a valid
policy based reason for deletion. Talkpage discussion has addressed whether it is eligible for BLPDELETE, and I think that
TransporterMan has shown it is not. ☆
Bri (
talk) 16:11, 5 February 2020 (UTC)reply
comment If an editor has been blocked because {{COI}}, is ot not safe to subject their edited pages to scrutiny? Anyways, I am a newbie, I guess I have to watch and learn.
MesutOzula (
talk) 21:57, 6 February 2020 (UTC)reply
keep, there are two parties editing this page, first group is of the people who want to edit the page and make it positive, other ones are who wants to add controversy and make sure that it stays. All edits made by
User:Opelogbon is only on this page which cannot be of a new editor, he seems to talk like a super Wiki expert, who knows each and everything about the Wikipedia, a possible sockfarm. Apart from it Segun Adebutu deserves a place. 04:48, 8 February 2020 (UTC) — Preceding
unsigned comment added by
Shashanksinghvi334 (
talk •
contribs) reply
Keep Passes
WP:GNG per Bri this seems to have some history on the talk page as well
Dartslilly (
talk) 15:41, 11 February 2020 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.