The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
Completing nomination for 149.68.7.120, rationale is as follows: Article does not meet notability guidelines. I have no opinion. Hut 8.5 20:18, 2 June 2015 (UTC)reply
Leaning towards delete - All my searches found nothing significant and notable aside from the following results
here and
here. Unless other sources are found, there's not much.
SwisterTwistertalk 19:42, 4 June 2015 (UTC)reply
You don't explain why we should ignore the results that you did find. Obviously, if you're going to put search results aside, you're not going to be successful in establishing notability.
Andrew D. (
talk) 07:06, 10 June 2015 (UTC)reply
Because the results didn't seem significant enough.
SwisterTwistertalk 16:19, 10 June 2015 (UTC)reply
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Davewild (
talk) 20:45, 9 June 2015 (UTC)reply
Speedy Keep The nominator states that he has no opinion and so clearly has not done
due diligence on this while the opinion of a passing IP does not seem reliable when it only takes a moment to find a source for the topic such as Software Quality.
AFD is not cleanup.
Andrew D. (
talk) 07:02, 10 June 2015 (UTC)reply
I'm not the nominator, 149.68.7.120 is. The reason the nomination process has to be completed by a registered user is purely technical. I would in fact have refused to complete the nomination if it was obviously flawed, but it isn't - the article does not contain any indication that the subject is notable. Hut 8.5 20:30, 10 June 2015 (UTC)reply
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 00:34, 17 June 2015 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.