The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was no consensus. No prejudice against individual nominations for each topic. The merge suggestion later in the discussion can be discussed on various article talk pages, if desired. North America1000 10:04, 18 March 2022 (UTC)reply
Cited sources do not indicate notability (which is not inherited from its indisputably notable parent organization)
ElKevbo (
talk) 05:45, 23 February 2022 (UTC)reply
I am also nominating the following related pages for the same reason:
Delete we do not have the depth of sourcing to justify seperate articles on these sub-units of a university.
John Pack Lambert (
talk) 13:57, 23 February 2022 (UTC)reply
Procedural keep It's possible that some may not be notable, but these need to be analyzed individually. Additionally, I would be surprised if the school of engineering at what is considered to be one of the best universities in the world in that field is not notable. Best,
GPL93 (
talk) 18:42, 23 February 2022 (UTC)reply
It's pretty unusual for individual colleges at U.S. universities to be independently notable; the onus is on those who claim that they are to substantiate that claim.
ElKevbo (
talk) 22:48, 23 February 2022 (UTC)reply
Delete from what I can tell all of these are referenced to extremely trivial and (or) primary sources. I couldn't find any in-depth secondary coverage about them when I looked either. In the meantime it's perfectly fine to mention whatever minor bit of these might be notable in
Georgia Institute of Technology. So there's really no valid justification to keep the articles. Especially considering these aren't even mentioned in the parent article at this point. If they aren't notable enough to be included in the main article then there's no way they are notable enough for separate articles. --
Adamant1 (
talk) 02:29, 24 February 2022 (UTC)reply
I've added a few sources as well, we could add tons more if we took the time.--Milowent • hasspoken 18:59, 24 February 2022 (UTC)reply
Thanks. If you can find substantive and independent sources about these schools - not specific programs at the school, not people who at one time worked at the school, and not the university of which the school is a constituent member - then please add them to the articles!
ElKevbo (
talk) 03:09, 25 February 2022 (UTC)reply
Of course I could, but writing so much about American business schools might crush my soul.--Milowent • hasspoken 13:19, 25 February 2022 (UTC)reply
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus. Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 02:30, 3 March 2022 (UTC)reply
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus. Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Sandstein 13:41, 10 March 2022 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.