- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. → Call me Hahc 21 00:45, 1 April 2014 (UTC)
Sawansukha Jewellers
- Sawansukha Jewellers ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Non-notable company. CSD removed by ANOM. Lacks non-trivial support. Fails WP:COMPANY. reddogsix ( talk) 05:03, 25 March 2014 (UTC)
- Delete: The Hindustan Times has had a couple of passing mentions of exhibitions by the firm, but I see nothing that amounts to coverage specifically about the firm that can demonstrate WP:CORPDEPTH. AllyD ( talk) 07:23, 25 March 2014 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k ( talk) 00:53, 27 March 2014 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k ( talk) 00:53, 27 March 2014 (UTC)
- Delete. Essentially it is spam. — RHaworth ( talk · contribs) 10:04, 28 March 2014 (UTC)
- Comment: The article creator deleted the AfD notice from the article, after which another editor renominated it. Any views at the second AfD should be taken into account in a decision here. AllyD ( talk) 17:04, 28 March 2014 (UTC)
- Delete serious Deleter crieria of spam and missing notability Shrikanthv ( talk) 04:56, 31 March 2014 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.