The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. MBisanztalk 23:52, 27 April 2009 (UTC)reply
Weak delete. Her Japanese Wikipedia page is more substantial, and seems to indicate that she a news talking head for CNN, wrote a book and was in a film. It was a good call not to speedy, it's possible there's something there. I don't read Japanese very well though, so I can't be certain.
XymmaxSo let it be writtenSo let it be done 13:35, 15 April 2009 (UTC)reply
Comment I agree the article as is does not display any notability. And with that said, it appears to me it is possible to establish enough notability by evidences including (but not limited to) 1) her book being awarded
here (
list of award recipients). 2) covered in multiple other mainstream
sources. I am not voting for Keep as I am not willing to do it myself. If the article as we see now has to be deleted, what do we lose.
An off main topic, but possibly more important question is, what is the ground for having the photo on the page with another lady, with her name displayed, who is yet unknown. --
Mantokun (
talk) 14:57, 15 April 2009 (UTC)reply
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached. Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
XymmaxSo let it be writtenSo let it be done 10:14, 21 April 2009 (UTC)reply
Keep at least a little while Let's see if it's better sourced by the end of the 2nd 7 days. DGG (
talk) 23:09, 21 April 2009 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.