The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus. -- Amanda (aka DQ) 12:14, 6 February 2021 (UTC) reply

Satish Sikha

Satish Sikha (  | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log)

(Find sources:  Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Promotional and non-notable BLP. Fails WP:BASIC, WP:GNG RationalPuff ( talk) 17:05, 19 January 2021 (UTC) reply

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. RationalPuff ( talk) 17:05, 19 January 2021 (UTC) reply

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Fashion-related deletion discussions. RationalPuff ( talk) 17:05, 19 January 2021 (UTC) reply

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. RationalPuff ( talk) 17:05, 19 January 2021 (UTC) reply

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Canada-related deletion discussions. RationalPuff ( talk) 17:05, 19 January 2021 (UTC) reply

• Delete article on a non-notable fashion designer. John Pack Lambert ( talk) 21:53, 19 January 2021 (UTC) reply
• Keep. In addition to the four sources in the article, I found one in the Deccan Chronicle, one in the New Indian Express, and one in the Indian Express dating from 2009 to 2019 so this is a GNG pass. Mccapra ( talk) 05:27, 26 January 2021 (UTC) reply

• Keep, found a number of credible sources about the subject and have added them to the article. Luciapop ( talk) 11:17, 26 January 2021 (UTC) reply

• Keep I think the article is good to go for Wikipedia, the mentioned references and sources put subject on the stronger side to stay on Wikipedia. Additionally, I have found other credible sources about subject which I am mentioning here as below:

^{[1] [2]}

I request other editors to review this and add these links to article to make it the better version Syoz ( talk) 12:47, 1 February 2021 (UTC) — Syoz ( talk • contribs) has made few or no other edits outside this topic. reply

Your commentary is likely not to be considered if you aren't familiar with the relevant notability guidelines and arguing your position based on whether the subject meets those criteria or not. Cyphoidbomb ( talk) 20:32, 1 February 2021 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.