The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. joe decker ^talk 15:53, 9 December 2015 (UTC) reply

Sarath Lakshman

Sarath Lakshman (  | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)

(Find sources:  Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Another non-reliable page of Indian bloggers, clearly fails WP:GNG Kavdiamanju ( talk) 01:09, 17 November 2015 (UTC) reply

Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. -- Ascii002 ( talk · contribs · guestbook) 02:48, 17 November 2015 (UTC) reply

Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. Sam Sailor ^Talk! 02:28, 24 November 2015 (UTC) reply

• Delete. Sources to support subject is meeting WP:BASIC have not been found. Sam Sailor ^Talk! 02:31, 24 November 2015 (UTC) reply

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Computing-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k ( talk) 19:08, 1 December 2015 (UTC) reply

• Delete for lack of significant coverage in independent reliable sources. Better than some of these, Google Scholar lists his Linux shell scripting cookbook as "cited by 3". -- Bejnar ( talk) 05:45, 9 December 2015 (UTC) reply
• Delete - Fails WP:GNG. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 13:52, 9 December 2015 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.