The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was keep.
Davewild (
talk) 17:25, 19 June 2015 (UTC)reply
Keep. I was originally going to say that this should redirect to the character's page since her role on Hollyoaks was notable, but a little digging brought up sources about her acting since then. It looks like she never returned to television but has enjoyed a moderate amount of success on the stage circuit, enough to where it'd show that she passes notability guidelines as a whole.
Tokyogirl79 (。◕‿◕。) 05:13, 6 June 2015 (UTC)reply
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Spirit of Eagle (
talk) 04:23, 12 June 2015 (UTC)reply
Leaning towards keep since she has received an acceptable (but not outstandingly significant) amount of coverage.
News indeed found results for stage work. I was also going to originally suggest moving since her IMDb only two things but I suppose this coverage is acceptable enough to keep.
SwisterTwistertalk 18:59, 16 June 2015 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.