From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Davewild ( talk) 17:25, 19 June 2015 (UTC) reply

Sarah Jane Buckley

Sarah Jane Buckley (  | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)
(Find sources:  Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Delete: Non-notable actress. Quis separabit? 04:13, 5 June 2015 (UTC) reply

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. lavender|(formerly HMSSolent)| lambast 05:15, 5 June 2015 (UTC) reply
Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. Pishcal 05:39, 5 June 2015 (UTC) reply
Note: This debate has been included in the list of United Kingdom-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k ( talk) 14:17, 5 June 2015 (UTC) reply
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k ( talk) 14:17, 5 June 2015 (UTC) reply
  • Keep. I was originally going to say that this should redirect to the character's page since her role on Hollyoaks was notable, but a little digging brought up sources about her acting since then. It looks like she never returned to television but has enjoyed a moderate amount of success on the stage circuit, enough to where it'd show that she passes notability guidelines as a whole. Tokyogirl79 (。◕‿◕。) 05:13, 6 June 2015 (UTC) reply
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Spirit of Eagle ( talk) 04:23, 12 June 2015 (UTC) reply
  • Leaning towards keep since she has received an acceptable (but not outstandingly significant) amount of coverage. News indeed found results for stage work. I was also going to originally suggest moving since her IMDb only two things but I suppose this coverage is acceptable enough to keep. SwisterTwister talk 18:59, 16 June 2015 (UTC) reply
  • Keep per SwisterTwister. DavidLeighEllis ( talk) 19:28, 18 June 2015 (UTC) reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.