The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
Fair enough. Didn't notice the vandalism as it was sourced, I assumed it was genuine.
JJLiu112 (
talk) 19:02, 17 November 2022 (UTC)reply
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus. Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, LizRead!Talk! 22:05, 23 November 2022 (UTC)reply
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus. Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, LizRead!Talk! 23:09, 30 November 2022 (UTC)reply
Speedy keep, don't understand why this is being relisted as AfD rationale is clearly erroneous (I note no concern about notability has been expressed, just questioning whether the place is real) - the source in the article is sufficient to show this is a real and officially recognised village. --
GGT (
talk) 01:04, 6 December 2022 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.