The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. WP:NOT → Call me Hahc 21 05:42, 24 March 2014 (UTC) reply

SandS

SandS (  | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)

(Find sources:  Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Notability not established; maybe a case of WP:TOOSOON. Article has references, but those have been cited at most a handful of times according to GScholar (which is usually quite accurate for computer science and related fields).

I've tried to find additional references, but the name "SandS" makes this quite difficult. "Project SandS" also gives mostly unrelated hits on DuckDuckGo, GScholar and GNews. QVVERTYVS ( hm?) 14:24, 8 March 2014 (UTC) reply

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Computing-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k ( talk) 16:00, 8 March 2014 (UTC) reply

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, NorthAmerica ¹⁰⁰⁰ 07:30, 17 March 2014 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.