- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. -- Malcolmxl5 ( talk) 20:51, 29 December 2015 (UTC)
San Luis Obispo Chamber of Commerce
- San Luis Obispo Chamber of Commerce ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
No indication of the geographically disperse coverage in reliable sources required by ORG. John from Idegon ( talk) 09:41, 22 December 2015 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. Regards, James( talk/ contribs) 06:41, 23 December 2015 (UTC)
- Delete - Local chamber of commerce with nothing else to suggest a considerably or even minimally better notable and improvable independent article. SwisterTwister talk 06:12, 24 December 2015 (UTC)
- Delete I wouldn't expect geographically wide coverage of a local organization of this type, and SLO is a small-ish town distant from major urban areas whose normal business would not get noticed by regional media. I was able to find this and this, in local media, but that's not much. I also looked to see if/how WP covers Chambers of Commerce -- there are individual articles for a few large cities ( Los Angeles Chamber of Commerce, Chicagoland Chamber of Commerce), but chambers for towns the size of SLO do not get stand-alone articles. The chamber gets one sentence in the San Luis Obispo, California article, so presumably a few more sentences could be added there. LaMona ( talk) 19:16, 24 December 2015 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, The Bushranger One ping only 02:26, 29 December 2015 (UTC)
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, The Bushranger One ping only 02:26, 29 December 2015 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of California-related deletion discussions. North America 1000 02:41, 29 December 2015 (UTC)
- Delete. I found a number of WP:TRIVIALMENTIONs in local media, but nothing to substantiate notability per WP:ORG or WP:GNG. -- Notecardforfree ( talk) 07:18, 29 December 2015 (UTC)
- Delete per User:LaMona. The appropriate place for information about anything noteworthy for this organisation, such as any material impact of their Economic Vision document, would be in the article on the city itself. AllyD ( talk) 08:12, 29 December 2015 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.