The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
Verified settlements, cities, towns, etc., are generally considered inherently notable as it's impossible for them to exist without sources (see
WP:OUTCOMES). This being an isolated village in a Spanish speaking nation in what many people would consider a "developing" region makes finding online sources for English speakers difficult. Whether on paper and/or in Spanish, they certainly exist.--
Oakshade (
talk) 21:42, 15 June 2014 (UTC)reply
@
Oakshade: Well, I really don't see how we can keep an article with no sources, regardless of notability.
United States Man (
talk) 03:16, 16 June 2014 (UTC)reply
As
WP:AFD states, barring serious BLP issues, if sources exist but are simply not in the article, that's not a proper basis for deletion. --
Oakshade (
talk) 04:18, 16 June 2014 (UTC)reply
Keep per reasons outlined in the generally-accepted (not current) version of
WP:NPLACE.
Ansh666 11:42, 17 June 2014 (UTC)reply
I did that. This article could very possibly be saved; but, as a starter, it should be saved from the monopoly of Manolito, at least until 18:09 hours local time, to give them some time to develop their English. (I cannot write more openly, because I would not like to breach any policy or guideline. :-) --
Why should I have a User Name? (
talk) 17:13, 17 June 2014 (UTC)reply
Sorry, but I don't follow.
Ansh666 17:17, 17 June 2014 (UTC)reply
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
NorthAmerica1000 02:31, 19 June 2014 (UTC)reply
Keep The article is about a permanently populated town, so it should be presumed to be notable.
Spirit of Eagle (
talk) 02:40, 19 June 2014 (UTC)reply
There is no such thing as "inherent notability", I assume you mean "presumed notable".
Ansh666 10:35, 19 June 2014 (UTC)reply
Its a
legitimate concept. I'm essentially arguing that towns with permanent populations automatically meet notability requirements.
Spirit of Eagle (
talk) 23:38, 19 June 2014 (UTC)reply
Fine, I give. I've edited my comment, although this doesn't change my belief that towns with permanent populations are deserving of articles.
Spirit of Eagle (
talk) 03:34, 20 June 2014 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.