The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
Person of only local or at best regional notability. The
Order of Canada does not confer sufficient notability as more than 150 of them are given out each year. Article creator seems to have created articles on six members of this family.
Softlavender (
talk) 03:58, 28 March 2018 (UTC)reply
Delete as creation of sockpuppet, without prejudice against recreation if somebody else is willing to take it on. The
Order of Canadais a notable distinction that counts as a valid notability claim — the number of people who receive it annually is a standard that's applied to lower-level distinctions like the
Queen Elizabeth II Silver Jubilee Medal, not to the OC, so he does have valid grounds for inclusion. What's more determinative here is the sockpuppet problem — for denial of attribution reasons, we have to delete content created by sockpuppets of already-banned editors, and then permit recreation by somebody else.
Bearcat (
talk) 17:03, 28 March 2018 (UTC)reply
Delete The OOC is good, but the rest reads like
WP:VANISPAM... a family history that is not particularly interesting to a general audience, and largely unsourced.
104.163.147.121 (
talk) 00:57, 31 March 2018 (UTC)reply
Delete as creation of a sockpuppet.
scope_creep (
talk) 10:42, 31 March 2018 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.