The result was delete. King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 01:09, 13 April 2009 (UTC) reply
This seems to be a neologism. A google search of Same-sex marriage in flux and of Same-sex unions in flux doesn't suggest it is a widespread term, with (currently) 6 cumulative hits--two of which are to Wikipedia and none of which are reliable sources. There are 0 hits for the term at google books ( [1] [2]), 0 at google scholar ( [3], [4]) and 0 at google news ( [5], [6].) The article makes clear that it is asserting that this is a term, not just a concept: "Same-sex marriage (or "same-sex unions) in flux" is a term that describes a form of same-sex union"; "The term "in flux" helps other users and readers diaffentirerate between a country or region that has already ruled in favor of legalizing such unions." Also, the article is unsourced and only ever cited to another Wikipedia article. We already have both Same-sex marriage and Same-sex relationship. This was a challenged PROD. Moonriddengirl (talk) 10:58, 7 April 2009 (UTC) reply