The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was Delete.
Michig (
talk) 20:05, 25 February 2018 (UTC)reply
The article relies entirely on one source - their own website, which no longer exists. A search turned up a FaceBook page, a YouTube video, and a couple of Wikipedia scrapes. Fails
WP:NORG.
Narky Blert (
talk) 19:22, 11 February 2018 (UTC)reply
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Jdcomix (
talk) 19:44, 18 February 2018 (UTC)reply
Delete. First off, some of the information is anachronistic, such as an email from the 1970s. Next, a simple Google news search reveals zero sources. Almost nothing is sourced, even to their own website. It's a just a youth association, one of
many.
Bearian (
talk) 00:13, 25 February 2018 (UTC)reply
Delete, without prejudice against recreation in the future if somebody can find proper sourcing to do better. An organization like this is not automatically entitled to have a Wikipedia article just because it exists or existed, if the only sourcing present in that article is its own
self-published content about itself — it needs to be the subject of
reliable source coverage in media, not just to have its own website, to earn inclusion here.
Bearcat (
talk) 19:16, 25 February 2018 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.