The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete ♠
PMC♠
(talk) 13:59, 16 February 2017 (UTC)reply
Non-notable person. Winning a state boys' contest doesn't suffice under
WP:NTENNIS, nothing else in the article suggests notability, and little independent coverage turns up in online searches, failing to meet
WP:GNG.
Largoplazo (
talk) 01:51, 9 February 2017 (UTC)reply
He is a well known man in Shanghai. He is just not that present on the internet — Preceding
unsigned comment added by
99.232.140.149 (
talk) 01:54, 9 February 2017 (UTC)reply
A finding of notability based on being well-known calls for evidence of this under the terms of the
general notability guidelines. We'd need to know there are a number of independent
reliable sources giving him substantial coverage.
Largoplazo (
talk) 02:11, 9 February 2017 (UTC)reply
Speedy Delete nothing to suggests any notability
WP:BIO,
WP:GNG or
WP:NTENNIS. As attested to by IP above just a well known local.
KylieTastic (
talk) 12:45, 9 February 2017 (UTC)reply
Delete The first reference is the very definition of trivial coverage, it mentions him in passing as someone who won a doubles championship (not individual state champion as implied int he article) ten years ago. The other source isn't a proper reference at all, and the only mention it makes of the article subject is that they are a contact person for events. That falls well short of
general notability.
Beeblebrox (
talk) 02:29, 10 February 2017 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.