Sources are trivial (included in a list of other youtubers) and non-independent. One significant coverage is about his investigation by the police. No other significant independent secondary source covering his popularity as a content creator. -
AlbeitPK (
talk) 01:51, 22 May 2024 (UTC)reply
Delete Most of the sources cover the police investigating him. That is not enough to satisfy
WP:BIO.
LibStar (
talk) 17:42, 28 May 2024 (UTC)reply
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus. Relisting comment: Given previous AFDs, not eligible for Soft Deletion. Have any sources mentioned in previous discussions been examined? Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, LizRead!Talk! 00:54, 29 May 2024 (UTC)reply
Delete: An article that doesn't meet
WP:ENT for inclusion on Wikipedia. While I couldn't find any clue in the former AFDs that I still hold deep breath of how it had survived two–three discussions. I am not going to base in any past whatsoever but here is the source analysis and final conclusion.
source 1 is a primary source but it verifies the content as used in most of the articles like that per
WP:PRIMARYSOURCE.
Source 2 is good for sourcing but doesn't support the 'wife marriage'.
source 3 is an obvious advert and
interview making me suspect the credibility/reliability of source 2.
Source 4 is unreliable, and
source 5 looks like an advertorial unverifiable publication.
Source 6,
source 7, and
source 8 contributes to a non notable controversy and I call it
WP:BLP1E because the said event is not notable for a standalone article.
[1] and
[2] supports a non notable film and book, hence doesn't meet
WP:NACTOR or
WP:NAUTHOR. Safari ScribeEdits!Talk! 21:08, 29 May 2024 (UTC)reply
Delete. Previously I nominated this article for Afd and my view still same. There is no
WP:SIGCOV and fails
WP:GNG.
আফতাবুজ্জামান (
talk) 21:56, 4 June 2024 (UTC)reply
Keep Article has been improved and more reliable sources are added, such as
The Daily Star or
Prothom Alo. Popular national reliable newspapers claim that Salman Muqtadir is a popular YouTuber and actor and there are a bunch of sources about him from reliable sites. Although some news are about his marriage or other things but they are published independently about him and declared him as YouTuber, influencer or actor. Therefore GNG has been able to establish.
Ontor22 (
talk) 12:03, 6 June 2024 (UTC)reply
The Daily star tag link you showed popped paid/sponsored articles
[3],
[4],
[5], and
[6]. They doesn't credibly means this article won't met notability later. See
WP:LOTSOFSOURCES and know there isn't any amount of sources you add to a
non notable person to be notable. On the aspect scene of YouTube, famous people are
celebrities bur that doesn't mean try are
notable. Safari ScribeEdits!Talk! 18:58, 7 June 2024 (UTC)reply
News from
The Daily Star are not paid or sponsored articles at all. Other news channels including Daily Star use disclaimers on sponsored articles but these are not. His marriage news appeared in multiple news channels.
Salman Muktadir is not only YouTuber but also worked in various entertainment fields including television, stage performance which established his notability based on
WP:ENT.
Ontor22 (
talk) 06:46, 14 June 2024 (UTC)reply
Delete - He is notable on YouTube as an influencer & content creator. but doesn't meet
WP:BIO or
WP:ENT for inclusion on Wikipedia.--
DelwarHossain (
talk) 11:22, 18 June 2024 (UTC)reply
Keep - He is notable person. I agree with
Ontor22.
Yubrajhn (
talk) 19:30, 18 June 2024 (UTC)reply