From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was WP:G5 per Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Asaidmanar. -- RoySmith (talk) 18:43, 30 January 2022 (UTC) reply

Salah Eddine Saadouni

Salah Eddine Saadouni (  | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log | edits since nomination)
(Find sources:  Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

A lot of cross-wiki spam and sockpuppetry around this person since April 2021. Recreated again today by a supposedly new account. Clearly fails WP:CREATIVE having never been involved in a notable piece of work. No significant coverage of Saadouni himself either so fails WP:GNG. Source analysis to follow. Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 19:45, 27 January 2022 (UTC) reply

Source assessment table:
Source Independent? Reliable? Significant coverage? Count source toward GNG?
https://peopleai.com/fame/identities/salah-eddine-saadouni No No No evidence of fact checking No Lacks coverage and the claim that he is worth $304,000,000,000 is absurd to the extreme No
https://scholar.google.com/citations?user=HrTYCRYAAAAJ&hl=fr No No No Profile page No
https://www.imdb.com/title/tt14457020/ No No See WP:IMDB No Passing mention No
https://mediafrontbox.blogspot.com/2021/10/the-best-12-salah-eddine-saadouni.html No No Blogspot likely created by subject himself No No
https://music.amazon.com/artists/B09JS8GJFD/salah-eddine-saadouni No No No Amazon listing is not significant No
https://www.imdb.com/name/nm12468107/ No No WP:IMDB No User generated profile page No
This table may not be a final or consensus view; it may summarize developing consensus, or reflect assessments of a single editor. Created using {{ source assess table}}.
Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 19:50, 27 January 2022 (UTC) reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.