The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. – Darkwind ( talk) 00:13, 10 July 2020 (UTC) reply

Sala Polivalentă (Blaj)

Sala Polivalentă (Blaj) (  | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)

(Find sources:  Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Clear Case of WP:TOOSOON, not yet build CommanderWaterford ( talk) 07:17, 22 June 2020 (UTC) reply

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. CommanderWaterford ( talk) 07:17, 22 June 2020 (UTC) reply

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Romania-related deletion discussions. Shellwood ( talk) 07:19, 22 June 2020 (UTC) reply

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Architecture-related deletion discussions. North America ¹⁰⁰⁰ 09:21, 22 June 2020 (UTC) reply

• Keep: Certainly you want to prove yourself, you could have clicked on the provided links, how to be too soon when the arena is at 20%? Photos & Videos You should have checked! Plus don't forget nowadays we even have this category /info/en/?search=Category:Proposed_indoor_arenas but this arena is UNDER CONSTRUCTION and goes to /info/en/?search=Category:Indoor_arenas_under_construction_in_Romania. The admininstrators should have already removed your template instead of listing it! It is a mistake. Rostadia2012 ( talk) 13:32, 22 June 2020 (UTC) reply

  Rostadia2012, that category was made by you and as far as I can tell, all of the pages within it? Ed6767 talk! 16:56, 22 June 2020 (UTC) reply

  Ed6767, DO YOU LISTEN YOURSELF? It belongs to the /info/en/?search=Category:Indoor_arenas_under_construction I created sub-category, not the category. Rostadia2012 ( talk) 18:28, 22 June 2020 (UTC) reply

  Rostadia2012, calm down, your lack of civility isn't particularly inclining me to listen to your points. You should realise that an admin will only delete if an article meets speedy deletion criteria. An AfD is a standard process to reach consensus on the deletion of a page. Ed6767 talk! 17:57, 22 June 2020 (UTC) reply

• Delete - very much a case of WP:TOOSOON, maybe fails WP:GNG. The place doesn't even exist yet, so sources are rare and often from first parties (i.e. builders, architects, press releases ext..). With some time, it may become worthwhile to undelete, but for now, too soon. Ed6767 talk! 16:58, 22 June 2020 (UTC) reply

  It's under construction, I only published 2 sources, what's wrong with it? You are breaking the rules. Stop lying, Adevărul is like Romanian Washington Post! Something is fishy here if you say that. Most of the sources are not first parties, but national and regional newspapers. The architect/builders are Italian, they did not even publish anything. And a mayor interview is a press release? Rostadia2012 ( talk) 18:28, 22 June 2020 (UTC) reply

  Comparable arenas, should we also delete them? Risenga Ishall and Steppe Arena. And even Nye Jordal Amfi. Should we also delete the Moody Center? An admin should have intervened already, shouldn't have allowed this to be listed as proposed for deletion. Rostadia2012 ( talk) 18:46, 22 June 2020 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.