The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
A general question to the community. When someone selects the categories "Cemeteries in Colorado" and "Roman Catholic cemeteries in the United States", are they to assume that these lists are comprehensive? If this is not a reasonable assumption, then should those categories be modified to state "Notable Cemeteries in Colorado" and "Notable Roman Catholic cemeteries in the United States". Just curious. Thank you for your feedback.
Jeffrey.Wilson.OSF (
talk) 14:08, 3 December 2020 (UTC)reply
Jeffrey.Wilson.OSF - it depends on the list. There are certain lists which not limiting it to notable entries would make it impossible, e.g.
List of people from Phoenix. However, when a list can be contained to a reasonable degree, then it does not have to be limited to only notable entries. Categories, however, are only given to notable entrants, so no, those are not comprehensive, and since they are not lists, changing the title is irrelevant.
Onel5969TT me 18:20, 3 December 2020 (UTC)reply
Delete -- The vast majority of local churches are NN. The same should apply to cemeteries. In answer to Jeffrey Wilson, any one who regularly uses WP will know that only notable subjects have articles. Only articles are categorised. Accordingly, it is implicit in the category system that only notable cemeteries will appear. Mere existence is not enough to have a WP article.
Peterkingiron (
talk) 14:47, 6 December 2020 (UTC)reply
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Missvain (
talk) 00:39, 8 December 2020 (UTC)reply
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Missvain (
talk) 15:59, 16 December 2020 (UTC)reply
delete No real claim to notability, which is understandable given that this appears to be a relatively new cemetery.
Mangoe (
talk) 17:19, 16 December 2020 (UTC)reply
Weak keep - a quick read of news articles shows it's the choice of eternal rest for many notable or at least locally important persons. FWIW, my cousins live nearby and I've met then-Bishop Chaput, who consecrated it.
Bearian (
talk) 18:05, 17 December 2020 (UTC)reply
Delete Per the nom. Fails
WP:GNG due to lacking sustained independent
WP:SIGCOV of the topic. It only has local coverage because it's just a local cemetery. Notability is also
WP:NOTINHERITED, so it's meaningless however many or whose obituaries mention it.
Newshunter12 (
talk) 00:24, 19 December 2020 (UTC)reply
Redirect to
Roman Catholic Archdiocese of Denver; I've added a "Cemeteries" section to that page. Many cemeteries are not notable, and I see no sign this (fairly new) one is; however there is an obvious merge/redirect target to have a list entry.
power~enwiki (
π,
ν) 02:30, 23 December 2020 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.