The result was keep, but this article is screaming out for critical commentary (which exists in the refs already cited) and removal of the WP:FRINGE POV. Spinning Spark 23:32, 16 November 2012 (UTC) reply
Essentially a recreation of the deleted Coelbren_Rhodd. Which was recreated by Bedson immediately following the last AfD: Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Coelbren Rhodd (see [1] as well). It was confirmed to be spurious by an independent expert by someone at FTN, but this can't be pointed out except through OR and SYN. As far as I can see, it contains much of the same material, and I don't see what has come to light to allow for it's recreation against the old consensus. IRWolfie- ( talk) 23:07, 8 November 2012 (UTC) reply