The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete.
Yunshui雲水 08:24, 26 March 2020 (UTC)reply
The subject does not appear to be notable (see previous AFD for detailed rationale). This article was refunded by (who I'm sure is a
COI) editor and left alone after adding another batch of bad refs. My
WP:BEFORE still couldn't dig enough (read any) evidence of notability. Usedtobecool☎️ 16:20, 4 March 2020 (UTC)reply
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
KaisaL (
talk) 05:37, 12 March 2020 (UTC)reply
Comment. Working from the bottom of the ref section up, I found several of the sources don’t even mention him. However there are clearly some sources. Whether they’re enough to support a BLP or not I’m less sure.
Mccapra (
talk) 05:13, 19 March 2020 (UTC)reply
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, buidhe 06:07, 19 March 2020 (UTC)reply
Delete like the last incarnation of this article it suffers from ref bombing.
John Pack Lambert (
talk) 01:38, 21 March 2020 (UTC)reply
Delete per
WP:GNG. How is this guy at all notable? Please ping me if you find
proof.
Bearian (
talk) 02:18, 23 March 2020 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.