The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was no consensus. —
Crisco 1492 (
talk) 01:15, 16 July 2012 (UTC)reply
"49th largest private company in Colorado" is pretty feeble claim to fame.
Orange Mike |
Talk 15:07, 23 June 2012 (UTC)reply
Keep This companies profits exceed $100,000,000 a year and "is one of the largest, privately-held independent petroleum and natural gas producers in the United States"
Seasider91 (
talk) 15:30, 23 June 2012 (UTC)reply
reply - no, they have REVENUES in excess of US$100,000,000 - a very different thing. As to the latter assertion: it remains unsourced. --
Orange Mike |
Talk 14:49, 2 July 2012 (UTC)reply
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
KTC (
talk) 00:20, 1 July 2012 (UTC)reply
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
BusterD (
talk) 03:31, 8 July 2012 (UTC)reply
Delete Privately-held oil exploration company about which I could find no significant coverage.
[1] Once in a while they get a mention when they buy or sell an asset, but nothing ABOUT the company. Fails
WP:FIRM. --
MelanieN (
talk) 22:30, 15 July 2012 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.