The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Kudpung กุดผึ้ง ( talk) 14:56, 14 June 2015 (UTC) reply

Saevus Wildlife India Magazine

Saevus Wildlife India Magazine (  | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)

(Find sources:  Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Blatant advertising, but speedy deletion declined. QVVERTYVS ( hm?) 19:54, 7 June 2015 (UTC) reply

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Literature-related deletion discussions. North America ¹⁰⁰⁰ 21:00, 7 June 2015 (UTC) reply

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organisms-related deletion discussions. North America ¹⁰⁰⁰ 21:00, 7 June 2015 (UTC) reply

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Environment-related deletion discussions. North America ¹⁰⁰⁰ 21:00, 7 June 2015 (UTC) reply

Note: This debate has been included in the list of News media-related deletion discussions. North America ¹⁰⁰⁰ 21:00, 7 June 2015 (UTC) reply

Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. North America ¹⁰⁰⁰ 21:00, 7 June 2015 (UTC) reply

• Speedy delete G11, blatant advertising. I disagree with the deny rationale. For G11 it does not matter much whether the subject is notable or not. All that matters is whether there is a non-promotional version that we can revert to or whether the article can easily be edited to remove the promotional stuff. Neither appears to be the case here, almost every single sentence is worded in a promotional way. WP:TNT big time. Apart from that, I don't really see any evidence for notability either. -- Randykitty ( talk) 15:00, 8 June 2015 (UTC) reply
• Delete for now - As much I love wildlife and conservation, this magazine is not notable yet as my searches here and here (although the last search found a link that says "a leading photography magazine in India"; lastly, I found nothing at Highbeam and Thefreelibrary. I would've suggested moving but there's no good target and the article's current state is no help. SwisterTwister talk 05:29, 10 June 2015 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.