From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Failed WP:BIO. TerriersFan ( talk) 22:02, 27 June 2014 (UTC) reply

Sabīne Jemeļjanova

Sabīne Jemeļjanova (  | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)
(Find sources:  Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Not notable. Lacks coverage in independent reliable sources. Sources to lads mags for whom she poses without much clothes, not reliable sources. duffbeerforme ( talk) 11:54, 20 June 2014 (UTC) reply

  • delete fails WP:BIO. Lacking reliable sources. LibStar ( talk) 14:32, 20 June 2014 (UTC) reply
Note: This debate has been added to the WikiProject Pornography list of deletions. • Gene93k ( talk) 15:42, 20 June 2014 (UTC) reply
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Latvia-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k ( talk) 15:42, 20 June 2014 (UTC) reply
Note: This debate has been included in the list of England-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k ( talk) 15:42, 20 June 2014 (UTC) reply
Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k ( talk) 15:42, 20 June 2014 (UTC) reply
  • Delete Non-notable. No significant press coverage apart from what is expected for a run of the mill Page 3 model. Cowlibob ( talk) 15:51, 20 June 2014 (UTC) reply
  • Delete Non-notable glamour model. Molly Ann Lewis ( talk) 19:05, 20 June 2014 (UTC) reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.