The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 02:51, 18 November 2020 (UTC) reply

SKIDATA (India) Pvt Ltd

SKIDATA (India) Pvt Ltd (  | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log)

(Find sources:  Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Promotional article about a tech company which doesn't pass NCORP. Google search reveales sources that mention the company trivially. Faizal batliwala ( talk) 13:35, 8 November 2020 (UTC) reply

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. Faizal batliwala ( talk) 13:35, 8 November 2020 (UTC) reply

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. Faizal batliwala ( talk) 13:35, 8 November 2020 (UTC) reply

• Delete: An article about a company which seems to have been the main focus of the briefly active contributing editor. It is promotionally worded ("grand success" in this, "esteemed" in that). Searches find 2009 and 2013 coverage of joint-venture announcements, but these fall under trivial coverage at WP:CORPDEPTH. I am not seeing evidence of notability. (Much of the text, including the peacockery, is repeated in the SKIDATA article.) AllyD ( talk) 18:38, 8 November 2020 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.