- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was Delete. Michig ( talk) 08:50, 5 August 2014 (UTC)
Ryan Wickerham
- Ryan Wickerham ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Non-notable BLP. No sources that suggest notability, and the only claims to notability are projects he had minor roles in. All the sources are either IMDB links or a passing mention on a blog. Rwiggum ( Talk/ Contrib) 06:44, 29 July 2014 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. NickGibson3900 - Talk - Sign my Guestbook 08:26, 29 July 2014 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. NickGibson3900 - Talk - Sign my Guestbook 08:27, 29 July 2014 (UTC)
- Delete fails WP:GNG LADY LOTUS • TALK 13:53, 29 July 2014 (UTC)
- Commentary - Ryan Wickerham is a hack who hasn't produced anything that is commercially viable in the entertainment industry and has actually cost his investors severe losses of hundreds of thousands of dollars. His page was spin he provided from five years ago and time has shown it was really nothing but spin, Sorry I ever posted it. About the only thing recently published about him online is his assault conviction and subsequent appeal. http://www.search.txcourts.gov/Case.aspx?cn=03-13-00747-CR Just another product of the "Austin Film Scene." Carbonflyer ( talk) 14:18, 29 July 2014 (UTC)
- Delete per nom and Lady Lotus, not notable enough. -- Why should I have a User Name? ( talk) 22:18, 29 July 2014 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.