The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was Draftify. There's no true consensus, but closing this as NC would keep something in mainspace which most people agree shouldn't be there. Draft seems like a reasonable compromise. --
RoySmith(talk) 16:20, 23 February 2019 (UTC)reply
Keep There are several independent sources and so the subject passes
WP:GNG.
Andrew D. (
talk) 11:03, 4 February 2019 (UTC)reply
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Ad Orientem (
talk) 00:38, 8 February 2019 (UTC)reply
Move to draft to provide time for evidence of the notability of this subject to develop. If no improvement is made in due time, the draft will be abandoned and deleted as such.
bd2412T 03:13, 15 February 2019 (UTC)reply
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 17:11, 15 February 2019 (UTC)reply
Delete. The sources found or cited are quite poor, and certainly do not meet
WP:NPERSON or even
WP:GNG: NYS Women Inc is a women's support group that has simply
put up subject's
cv; the New Strait Timespiece is pure
advertorial, with a link to the NYS Women Inc cv; and Ipoh Echo is a small local newspaper at
Perak. This is just trivial coverage. Let's be gracious and call it a case of
WP:TOOSOON. -
The Gnome (
talk) 10:59, 23 February 2019 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.