From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete‎. plicit 12:27, 3 May 2023 (UTC) reply

Rune Sovndahl

Rune Sovndahl (  | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log | edits since nomination)
(Find sources:  Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails NBUSINESSPERSON and NAUTHOR. The first, eleventh, and eighteenth sources are from beststartup.co.uk, a for-profit WP:SPONSORED website, which is certainly unreliable. Fancy Refrigerator ( talk) 11:23, 26 April 2023 (UTC) reply

That said, I'm on the fence about notability at the moment, as it's got substantial profiles from the BBC and Money Week. The Financial Times and Guardian sources are also substantial, but both are interviews so not secondary sources. Uncle Spock ( talk) 11:48, 26 April 2023 (UTC) reply
Looks like the subject inherits notability from his company Fantastic Services. Much of the sources focus on his company and not the man himself. Fancy Refrigerator ( talk) 12:22, 26 April 2023 (UTC) reply
  • Delete Blatant promotion of a non-notable businessman. May need salting. QuicoleJR ( talk) 13:24, 26 April 2023 (UTC) reply
  • Delete and salt: Fails GNG, repeatedly deleted and recreated, main editor ( MediaWatch) blocked for WP:UPE. Flip Format ( talk) 13:34, 26 April 2023 (UTC) reply
  • Delete and salt, not notable and keeps coming back. Oaktree b ( talk) 14:41, 26 April 2023 (UTC) reply
  • Delete + Salt - Completely fails GNG, and yet repeatedly recreated. Also seems to have a veiled promotional angle towards his company as well. -- TheInsatiableOne ( talk) 08:20, 27 April 2023 (UTC) reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.