The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
probable keep almost certainly will meet GNG, but needs a serious effort to source it. DGG (
talk ) 01:58, 13 June 2014 (UTC)reply
Delete - This one is borderline. He has been in the media a decent amount and has worked on a number of notable things, but I can't say that he himself is notable as opposed to being on the periphery of notable things and getting mentions for his hand in them. I think he just barely fails GNG.
Bali88 (
talk) 01:59, 13 June 2014 (UTC)reply
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
NorthAmerica1000 01:59, 21 June 2014 (UTC)reply
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
NorthAmerica1000 01:55, 29 June 2014 (UTC)reply
Delete' A few years as a state official, during which he got surprisingly little press coverage considering how high-profile the state fire chief of California ought to be. Passing mentions or quotes in various news stories. Nothing significantly ABOUT him. --
MelanieN (
talk) 00:32, 1 July 2014 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.