- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was withdrawn. ✗ plicit 12:21, 10 May 2022 (UTC)
Roy Schwartz Tichon
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- Roy Schwartz Tichon ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log | edits since nomination)
- (Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Businessman BLP doesn't seem to meet
WP:NBIO- the company is likely notable but this isn't
WP:INHERITED to the individual.
MrsSnoozyTurtle 07:50, 3 May 2022 (UTC)
Withdrawn by nominator. MrsSnoozyTurtle 22:26, 9 May 2022 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Businesspeople and Israel. Shellwood ( talk) 08:38, 3 May 2022 (UTC)
- support - Schwartz Tichon made a notable impact with his demand for privatizing the public transportation companies. "Noa Tanua" is just a part of it. his activity plus writing in the newspapers plus podcast plus being chosen for "People of 2017" by Time Out Tel Aviv makes him meet
WP:NBIO.
Ofir michael (
talk) 05:11, 4 May 2022 (UTC)
- support - Why is this article nominated for deletion in the first place? I worked on it a lot and already explained its importance several times, and so I believe I deserve an explanation. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Amir Segev Sarusi ( talk • contribs) 17:32, 5 May 2022 (UTC)
- support - Schwartz Tichon made a notable impact with his demand for privatizing the public transportation companies. "Noa Tanua" is just a part of it. his activity plus writing in the newspapers plus podcast plus being chosen for "People of 2017" by Time Out Tel Aviv makes him meet
WP:NBIO.
Ofir michael (
talk) 05:11, 4 May 2022 (UTC)
- As far as I can see, this discussion is about whether or not Roy meets business criteria. Nonetheless, the result should not be deletion. While I might have been mistaken, categorizing him as businessman, the basic notability criteria for people is:
- "People are presumed notable if they have received significant coverage in multiple published secondary sources that are reliable, intellectually independent of each other, and independent of the subject."
- Schwartz Tichon meets that criteria as he has been covered and recognized by multiple of the most known and significant Israeli media outlets, some of them are shown in the references, including: The top 2 Israeli news websites - Ynet and Walla, the top 3 Israeli newspapers - Yediot Ahronot, Haaretz and Israel Hayom, the three major Economic news outlets - TheMarker, Globes and Walla, The most viewed television news channels - 11,12, 13 and 14 ::::and several international news outlets. If it is a matter of number I can add more references, but he seems to meet this criteria. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Amir Segev Sarusi ( talk • contribs) 18:00, 5 May 2022 (UTC)
- Another point for Schwartz Tichon's notability is the fact that his position paper advocating government incentives to promote vaccination was adopted by the Minister of Justice. see here Ofir michael ( talk) 19:30, 5 May 2022 (UTC)
- As far as I can see, this discussion is about whether or not Roy meets business criteria. Nonetheless, the result should not be deletion. While I might have been mistaken, categorizing him as businessman, the basic notability criteria for people is:
- Keep as passing the WP:GNG. The number, breadth, and quality of sources is impressive. Can be changed into the organization but I would not recommend it. Not the effort and not the outcomes. Tichon is notable and next thing we have an article on the person and on the organization that will just rehash each other. gidonb ( talk) 16:35, 7 May 2022 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.