From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete‎. plicit 13:54, 24 October 2023 (UTC) reply

Roy Lipski

Roy Lipski (  | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log | edits since nomination)
(Find sources:  Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:BIO, WP:SIGCOV. Looked at the first blocks of references. Mix of PR, technical papers. Mostly passing mentions, company info or WP:PRIMARY, WP:SPS sources scope_creep Talk 09:16, 17 October 2023 (UTC) reply

Delete No enough notable references are weak 111.119.189.160 ( talk) 19:44, 17 October 2023 (UTC) reply
Does being "the first to develop sentiment analysis AI software" not count as notable? Stravensky ( talk) 22:51, 20 October 2023 (UTC) reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.