- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was keep. (non-admin closure) Natg 19 ( talk) 01:20, 31 July 2020 (UTC)
Rowdy No.1
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- Rowdy No.1 ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Article does not meet WP:NFILM or WP:GNG. Before revealed only film database entries. // Timothy :: talk 13:11, 23 July 2020 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. // Timothy :: talk 13:11, 23 July 2020 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. // Timothy :: talk 13:11, 23 July 2020 (UTC)
Delete per nom Spiderone 07:11, 24 July 2020 (UTC)- Keep: Its rather difficult to find online sources for old non-Hindi films of India. The film features Krishna, who was one of the leading stars of Telugu cinema, so its very likely that film is widely distributed. [1] Here is the film receiving full length reviews from two well known Telugu-language newspapers: Andhra Patrika [2] and Zamin Ryot. [3] Hence, the film fulfills #1 of other evidence of notability. -- Ab207 ( talk) 18:29, 25 July 2020 (UTC)
- Keep. Ab207 thank you for the sources, I'm happy to change my vote to Keep. Hopefully others will add more. // Timothy :: talk 19:04, 25 July 2020 (UTC)
References
- ^ "Rowdy No. 1's Ad on the very first page of leading Telugu newspaper".
- ^ "చిత్ర సమీక్ష: రౌడీ నెం. 1" [Film Review: Rowdy No. 1]. Andhra Patrika (in Telugu). 1988-06-21.
- ^ "యువతను ఉద్రేక పరిచే నవరసాల సమ్మేళనం: రౌడీ నెం. 1" [Rowdy No. 1 is a feast for youth] (PDF). Zamin Ryot (in Telugu). 1988-07-01.
- Keep as per the reliable sources coverage identified in this discussion and in the article so that deletionis no longer necessary, imv Atlantic306 ( talk) 22:18, 26 July 2020 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.